Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology

Advanced search

Modern Antiplatelet Therapy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. How to Make the Right Choice?

Full Text:


Dual antiplatelet therapy is the most important step in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treatment. The new generation of inhibitors of P2Y12 platelet receptors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) provide more pronounced platelet inhibition than clopidogrel. The drugs differ in pharmacodynamics and platelet reactivity tests due to different mechanisms of binding to P2Y12 receptors. The antiplatelet effect of prasugrel and ticagrelor provides clinical benefit and better prognosis in patients with various forms of ACS. In patients with ST-segment elevation ACS prasugrel and ticagrelor are preferred over clopi-dogrel due to their higher efficacy and better clinical outcomes, and currently have preferential positions in guidelines compared to clopidogrel. The comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor (ISAR-REACT 5 trial) demonstrated superiority of prasugrel over ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment elevation ACS, for whom an invasive evaluation is planned and in early invasive treatment non-ST-segment elevation ACS. The choice of a drug for dual antiplatelet therapy in various clinical situations remains controversial. The latest ESC guidelines on non-ST elevation ACS (2020) [1] demonstrate the possible preference for prasugrel in patients with ACS without ST-segment elevation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Current article demonstrates the results of recent clinical studies and the real clinical data regarding antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary interventions. The indications for the use of P2Y12 platelet inhibitors in certain groups of patients are outlined. Treatment selection of the most effective and safe drugs in patients with ACS is highlighted according to the updated European guidelines.

About the Authors

T. M. Uskach
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation

Tatiana M. Uskach - MD PhD, Leading Researcher, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology; Professor, Chair of Cardiology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education.
3-ya Cherepkovskaya ul. 15a, Moscow, 121552; Barrikadnaya ul. 2/1 build. 1, Moscow, 125993.

A. S. Tereshchenko
National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
Russian Federation

Andrey S. Tereshchenko - PhD, Researcher, National Medical Research Center of Cardiology.
3-ya Cherepkovskaya ul. 15a, Moscow, 121552.


1. Franchi F., Angiolillo D.J. Novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndrome. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(1):30-47. DOI:10.1038/nrcardio.2014.156.

2. Valgimigli M., Bueno H., Byrne R.A., et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for CardioThoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(3):213-60. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.

3. Patrono C., Andreotti F., Arnesen H., et al. Antiplatelet agents for the treatment and prevention of atherothrombosis. Eur Heart J 2011; 32(23):2922-32. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr373.

4. Garton M. COMMIT/CCS-2 studies. Lancet. 2006;368(9536):642. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69235-0.

5. Sabatine M., Cannon C., Gibson C., et al. CLARITY-TIMI 28 Investigators. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(12):1179-89. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa050522.

6. Mehta S., Tanguay J., Eikelboom J., et al. Double-dose Versus Standard-Dose Clopidogrel and High-Dose Versus Low-Dose Aspirin in Individuals Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7): A Randomised Factorial Trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9748):1233-43. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61088-4.

7. Yusuf S., Zhao F., Mehta S., et al. Effects of Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Without ST-segment Elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(7):494-502. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa010746.

8. Wiviott S.D., Braunwald E., McCabe C.H., et al. TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopi-dogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001-15. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0706482.

9. Wallentin L., Becker R.C., Budaj A., et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045-57. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa0904327.

10. Ibanez B., James S., Agewall S., et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119-77. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.

11. Collet J.P., Thiele H., Barbato E., et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2020;00:1-79. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.

12. Gurbel P.A., Bliden K.P., Butler K., et al. Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the anti-platelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation. 2009;120:2577-85. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.912550.

13. Farid N., McIntosh M., Garofolo F., et al. Determination of the Active and Inactive Metabolites of Prasugrel in Human Plasma by Liquid chromatography/tandem Mass Spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21:169-79. DOI:10.1002/rcm.2813.

14. Lhermusier T., Lipinski M.J., Tantry U.S., et al. Meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel effects on platelet reactivity. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:716-23. DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.029.

15. Lemesle G., Schurtz G., Bauters C., et al. High on-treatment platelet reactivity with ticagrelor versus prasugrel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13:931-42. DOI:10.1111/jth.12907.

16. Rollini F., Franchi F., Cho J.R., et al. A head-to-head pharmacodynamic comparison of prasugrel vs. ticagrelor after switching from clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease: results of a prospective randomized study. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(35):2722-30. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv744.

17. Motovska Z., Hlinomaz O., Kala P., et al. 1-Year Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty for Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(4):371-81. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.008.

18. Olier I., Sirker A., Hildick-Smith D.J.R., et al. Association of different antiplatelet therapies with mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart. 2018;104:1683-90. DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312366.

19. Krishnamurthy A., Keeble C., Anderson M., et al. Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Open Heart. 2019;6(1):e000951. DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2018-000951.

20. Schupke S., Neumann FJ., Menichelli M., et al. ISAR-REACT 5 Trial Investigators. Ticagrelor or pra-sugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1524-34. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1908973.

21. Jneid H. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes — The Winner Takes It All? N Engl J Med. 2019;381(16):1582-85. DOI:10.1056/NEJMe1911207.

22. Yang H., Tang B., Xu C., et al. Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel for the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10(1):81-93. DOI:10.1007/s13300-018-0537-7.

23. Schnorbus B., Daiber A., Jurk K., et al. Effects of clopidogrel vs. prasugrel vs. ticagrelor on endothelial function, inflammatory parameters, and platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary artery stenting: a randomized, blinded, parallel study. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(33):3144-52. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz917.

24. Montalescot G., Bolognese L., Dudek D., et al. ACCOAST Investigators. Pretreatment with prasugrel in non-STsegment elevation acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:999-1010. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1308075.

25. Dworeck C., Redfors B., Angeras O., et al. Association of pretreatment with P2Y12 receptor antagonists preceding percutaneous coronary intervention in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with outcomes. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(10):e2018735. DOI:10.1001/jamanet-workopen.2020.18735.

26. Knuuti J., Wijns W., Saraste A., et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:407-77. DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.

27. Lopes R.D., Heizer G., Aronson R., et al. AUGUSTUS Investigators. Antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or pci in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1509-24. DOI:10.1056/NE-JMoa1817083.

28. Lip G.Y.H., Collet J.P., Haude M., ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 Joint European consensus document on the management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Latin America Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), and Cardiac Arrhythmia Society of Southern Africa (CASSA). Europace. 2019; 21:192-3. DOI:10.1093/europace/euy174.

29. Instructions for medical use of Effient®. Registration certificate LP-000675 dated 09/28/11 (reissued on 07/05/2017). [cited 20.10.2020]. Available from: (In Russ.)

30. Instructions for the medical use of Brilinta®. Registration certificate LP-001059 dated 10/27/11 (reissued 1/15/16) [cited 10/20/2020]. Available from: (In Russ.)

For citation:

Uskach T.M., Tereshchenko A.S. Modern Antiplatelet Therapy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. How to Make the Right Choice? Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2020;16(6):1017-1023. (In Russ.)

Views: 156

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 1819-6446 (Print)
ISSN 2225-3653 (Online)