MODERN PRINCIPLES OF QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES TREATMENT
https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2014-10-4-397-401
Abstract
The most common ways of assessment of cardiovascular diseases treatment abroad, approaches to creation of such assessment methods are considered, as well as data on the principles of the assessment of treatment in Russia. Some foreign registers of acute myocardial infarction, the aim of which was therapy quality assessment, are given as examples. The problem of high-quality treatment based on data from evidence-based medicine, some legal aspects related to clinical guidelines in Russia are considered, as well as various ways of treatment quality assessment.
About the Authors
A. Yu. Suvorov
State Research Centre for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Petroverigsky per. 10, Moscow, 101990 Russia
Russian Federation
Petroverigsky per. 10, Moscow, 101990 Russia
S. Yu. Martsevich
State Research Centre for Preventive Medicine
Russian Federation
Petroverigsky per. 10, Moscow, 101990 Russia
Russian Federation
Petroverigsky per. 10, Moscow, 101990 Russia
References
1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312(7023):71-2.
2. Rousseau N, McColl E, Newton J, et al. Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerized evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ 2003;326(7384):314.
3. Burgers JS, Cluzeau FA, Hanna SE, et al. Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. International journal of technology assessment in health care 2003;19(1):148-57.
4. Burgers JS, Grol RP, Zaat JO, et al. Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. The British journal of general practice 2003;53(486):15-9.
5. Larson E. Status of practice guidelines in the United States: CDC guidelines as an example. Preventive medicine 2003;36(5):519-24.
6. Micieli G, Cavallini A, Quaglini S. Guideline compliance improves stroke outcome: a preliminary study in 4 districts in the Italian region of Lombardia. Stroke 2002;33(5):1341-7.
7. Norrving B, Wester P, Sunnerhagen KS, et al. Beyond conventional stroke guidelines: setting priorities. Stroke 2007;38(7):2185-90.
8. Kapral MK, Laupacis A, Phillips SJ, et al. Stroke care delivery in institutions participating in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Stroke 2004;35(7):1756-62.
9. Martsevich SYu, Drozdova LY, Lukina YuV, et al. How clinicians assess the possibilities of modern medical therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease. The results of the poll in Moscow and Voronezh. Ration Pharmacother Cardiol 2010; 6 (2): 145-8. Russian (Марцевич С.Ю. Дроздова Л.Ю., Лукина Ю.В., и др. Как оценивают практические врачи возможности современной медикаментозной терапии больных ишемической болезнью сердца. Результаты опросов в Москве и Воронеже. Рациональная Фармакотерапия в Кардиологии 2010;6(2):145-8).
10. Martsevich SYu, Drozdova LY, Voronina VP. Health and education of the doctor: two ingredients for success. Ration Pharmacother Cardiol 2010; 6 (1): 73-6. Russian (Марцевич С.Ю. Дроздова Л.Ю., Воронина В.П. Здоровье и образование врача: две составляющие успеха. Рациональная Фармакотерапия в Кардиологии 2010;6(1):73-6).
11. Ebben RH, Vloet LC, Verhofstad MH, et al. Adherence to guidelines and protocols in the prehospital and emergency care setting: a systematic review. Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine 2013;21:9.
12. Tsai CL, Magid DJ, Sullivan AF, et al. Quality of care for acute myocardial infarction in 58 U.S. emergency departments. Academic emergency 2010;17(9):940-50.
13. Kroch E, Van Dusen C. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)/Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Project. White Paper. Premier. 2012. Available at^ https://www.premierinc.com/wps/wcm/connect/d7ea1df4-bed3-4f96-bfbf-a2c664e64993/Premier_HQID_Final_White_Paper_28Nov2012.pdf?MOD=AJPERES. Accessed by 30.08.2014.
14. Peterson ED, Roe MT, Rumsfeld JS, et al. A call to ACTION (acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network): a national effort to promote timely clinical feedback and support continuous quality improvement for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes 2009;2(5):491-9.
15. Tu JV, Khalid L, Donovan LR, Ko DT. Indicators of quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction. CMAJ 2008;179(9):909-15.
16. Herrett E, Smeeth L, Walker L, Weston C. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP). Heart 2010;96(16):1264-7.
17. Schiele F, Capuano F, Derumeaux G, et al. Hospital ranking based on discharge prescriptions after acute myocardial infarction. A national assessment over 3 consecutive years. Abstract 5232. Eur Heart J 2012;33 ( Abstract Supplement ):955.
18. Eapen ZJ, Fonarow GC, Dai D, et al. Comparison of composite measure methodologies for rewarding quality of care: an analysis from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines program. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes 2011;4(6):610-8.
19. Normand SL, McNeil BJ, Peterson LE, Palmer RH. Eliciting expert opinion using the Delphi technique: identifying performance indicators for cardiovascular disease. International journal for quality in health care 1998;10(3):247-60.
20. Krumholz HM, Anderson JL, Bachelder BL, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration With the American Academy of Family Physicians and American College of Emergency Physicians Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Hospital Medicine. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008;52(24):2046-99.
21. Landrum MB, Bronskill SE, Normand S. Analytic Methods for Constructing Cross-Sectional Profiles of Health Care Providers. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2000;1(1):23-47.
22. Fox KA, Carruthers KF, Dunbar DR, et al. Underestimated and under-recognized: the late consequences of acute coronary syndrome (GRACE UK-Belgian Study). Eur Heart J 2010;31(22):2755-64.
23. Peterson ED, Delong ER, Masoudi FA, et al. ACCF/AHA 2010 Position Statement on Composite Measures for Healthcare Performance Assessment: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to develop a position statement on composite measures). Circulation 2010;121(15):1780-91.
24. Spertus JA, Eagle KA, Krumholz HM, et al. American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care. JACC 2005;45(7):1147-56.
25. Killip T 3rd, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients. JACC 1967;20(4):457-64.
26. Fox KA, Goodman SG, Klein W, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Eur Heart J 2002;23(15):1177-89.
27. The GUSTO investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. NEJM 1993;329(10):673-82.
28. Bernabeu-Wittel M, Formiga F, Ollero-Baturone M. A new prognostic index centered on polypathological patients. The PROFUND index. The journals of gerontology Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2011;66(12):1393-4.
29. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing research reviews 2011;10(4):430-9.
30. Sorokina TS. History of Medicine. Moscow: Academy; 2008. Russian (Сорокина Т.С. История медицины. М.: Академия; 2008).
31. Almazov VA, Chavpetsov VF. Rapid assessment of cardiac care, as a way of intensification of specialized medical services. Bulletin of AMS USSR 1988, 8: 38-43. Russian (Алмазов В.А., Чавпецов В.Ф. Оперативная оценка кардиологической помощи, как способ интенсификации специализированной медицинской службы. Вестник АМН СССР 1988;8:38-43).
32. Sokolov AM. Principles of integrated assessment of the level of care merdechno disease. Doctoring 1990; 3: 117-9. Russian (Соколов А.М. Принципы интегрированной оценки уровнем медицинской помощи мердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. Врачебное Дело 1990;3:117-9).
33. Federal Law "On the basis of health protection in the Russian Federation" N 323-FL (Ed. from 25.11.2013, 21.11.2011 Adopted by the State Duma). Russian (Федеральный закон "Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации" N 323-ФЗ (ред. от 25.11.2013; Принят Гос. Думой 21.11.2011 )).
34. Federal Law "On Compulsory Medical Insurance in the Russian Federation" N 326-FL. (Adopted by the State Duma 29.11.2010, Ed. from 25.11.2013). Russian (Федеральный закон “Об обязательном медицинском страховании в Российской Федерации” N 326-ФЗ. (Принят Гос. Думой 29.11.2010; ред. от 25.11.2013) ).
35. The results of work of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in 2013 and tasks for 2014 Mщысщц: MoH RF; 2014. Russian (Об итогах работы Министерства Здравоохранения Российской Федерации в 2013 г. и задачах на 2014 г. М.: МЗ РФ; 2014).
36. Ehrlich AD, Gratsianskii NA. Acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation in the actual practice of Russian hospitals. Comparative data registers "RECORD-2" and "RECORD". Cardiology 2012; 10: 9-16. Russian (Эрлих А.Д., Грацианский Н.А. Острый коронарный синдром без подъемов ST в реальной практике российских стационаров. Сравнительные данные регистров «РЕКОРД-2» и «РЕКОРД». Кардиология 2012;10:9-16).
37. Martsevich SYu, Ginsburg ML, Kutishenko NP, et al. The LIS Study (Lubertsy study mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction). Evaluation of drug therapy. Part 1: How patients are treated prior myocardial infarction, and how this affects mortality in the hospital. Ration Pharmacother Cardiol 2012, 8 (5): 681-4. Russian (Марцевич С.Ю., Гинзбург М.Л., Кутишенко Н.П., и др. Исследование ЛИС (Люберецкое исследование смертности больных, перенесших острый инфаркт миокарда). Оценка лекарственной терапии. Часть 1. Как лечатся больные перед инфарктом миокарда, и как это влияет на смертность в стационаре. Рациональная Фармакотерапия в Кардиологии 2012;8(5):681-4).
38. Boytsov SA, Martsevich SYu, Ginsburg ML, et al. Lubertsy mortality study of patients after stroke or transient ischemic attack (FOX-2). Design and evaluation of drug therapy. Ration Pharmacother Cardiol 2013; 9 (2): 114-22. Russian (Бойцов С.А., Марцевич С.Ю., Гинзбург М.Л., и др. Люберецкое исследование смертности больных, перенесших мозговой инсульт или транзиторную ишемическую атаку (ЛИС-2). Дизайн и оценка лекарственной терапии. Рациональная Фармакотерапия в Кардиологии 2013;9(2):114-22).
Review
For citations:
Suvorov A.Yu., Martsevich S.Yu. MODERN PRINCIPLES OF QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES TREATMENT. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2014;10(4):397-401. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2014-10-4-397-401
Views: 853
Email this article 